MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096039995 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-136673

Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Myelofibrosis Treated with Ruxolitinib: Evidence from a Multinational Medical Record Review

2020· article· en· W3096039995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesco Passamonti, Florian H. Heidel, Rohan Parikh, Derek Tang, Betsy J. Lahue, Jose Alberto Nadal, Keith L. Davis, Mayank Ajmera, Arianna Kee, Pranav Abraham

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuxolitinibMedicineMyelofibrosisCytopeniaInternal medicineMyeloproliferative neoplasmConstitutional symptomsTransplantationInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemPediatricsBone marrowMyelodysplastic syndromes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by cytopenia, splenomegaly, and debilitating constitutional symptoms, such as fatigue, night sweats, weight loss, bone pain, and pruritus. Prior to the approval of the selective Janus kinase-2 (JAK2) inhibitor fedratinib for adults with Intermediate (Int)-2 or High-risk MF in 2019, ruxolitinib (RUX) was the only FDA-approved JAK inhibitor and considered standard of care; treatment (tx) options after RUX were limited. Furthermore, although about 60% of pts carry JAK2 mutations, not all patients respond to RUX. The aim of this study was to describe real-world tx patterns and determine unmet need in pts with MF treated with RUX. Methods: We report interim data collected from the UK and USA as part of a global retrospective medical chart review of adult pts with Int-1, Int-2, or High-risk MF who started RUX tx between Jan 2012 and Dec 2016 in the USA, UK, Germany, Spain, Canada, and France, Pts were required to have discontinued RUX prior to data abstraction (Apr-May 2020). Prior tx was allowed, except for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation or JAK2 inhibitor trial participation. Study measures included pt and tx characteristics at RUX initiation, tx patterns, dose modifications (DMs), and clinical outcomes. The rate of DMs (decrease or increase) during the first 6 months of tx was assessed. Recommended dose (REC) as per US FDA label of RUX was determined via baseline platelet count; atypical dose (ATY) was defined as non-REC RUX. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median overall survival (OS) from start of RUX tx. Descriptive statistics are used in this report. Results: A total of 183 pts (USA: 105, UK: 78) were included in the analysis. Mean age at diagnosis was 63 years, 69% were male, and 82% were White. Most pts had primary MF (84%), Int-2-risk disease (51%), and JAK2 V617F driver mutation (67%). RUX was first-line MF tx in 100 pts (55%). Of 140 pts with baseline platelet counts, 46% started on REC RUX, and 54% started ATY RUX. Of pts who initiated ATY RUX, those with platelet count below 200 ×109/L were more likely to receive a higher dose; those with a platelet count above 200 ×109/L, were more likely to receive a lower dose. The median time from diagnosis to RUX initiation overall was 1.3 months (mos); this was shorter in pts initiated on REC RUX and longer in pts initiated on ATY RUX (Table). The median duration of tx (DoT) was higher for pts who initiated ATY RUX vs REC RUX (Table). Among pts who had a dose change (n = 61), change in platelet/neutrophil count (43%), and inadequate response (33%) were the main reasons for the first dose change; dose changes due to toxicity were more common with ATY RUX (33%) vs REC RUX (5%). Eighty-six pts (47%) had clinician-defined inadequate response or progressed on RUX. Pts starting ATY RUX (63% vs 39% for REC RUX) or having a DM within 6 mos of initiation (59% vs 49% for no DM) had a higher proportion of progressive disease (PD). Of those with inadequate response/PD, 69% discontinued RUX and 22% continued RUX due to lack of other effective tx. Twenty-eight percent of pts that started REC RUX discontinued RUX due to experiencing no additional clinical benefit after initial improvement; for pts who started ATY RUX, progression due to anemia (33%) was the main reason for discontinuation. In pts who did not discontinue RUX immediately after inadequate response/PD, median time to RUX discontinuation from inadequate response/PD was higher in pts who received ATY RUX vs REC RUX (6.1 vs 1.9 mos). Of 164 evaluable pts, 32 (20%) received post-RUX tx, most commonly hydroxyurea (28%) or lenalidomide (27%, USA only). Median OS since RUX initiation was 44.2 mos. OS was shorter in pts who started ATY vs REC RUX (40.9 vs 43.1 mos) and those who had a DM vs no DM within 6 mos (38.6 vs 43.0). The most common causes of death were PD (34%) and progression to AML (19%) - pts who received DMs within the first 6 mos were more likely to die from progression to AML (27%) vs those with no DMs (19%). Conclusions: In this population of adults with MF, we provide observational data that indicates DMs, including starting ATY RUX at higher or lower than REC doses, may be associated with poorer survival outcomes and higher rates of discontinuation due to PD. Relatively few pts received subsequent tx after discontinuing RUX, underscoring a significant unmet need for newer and more effective tx for MF. Disclosures Passamonti: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Parikh:RTI Health Solutions: Other: I am a full-time employee of RTI Health Solutions, which received research funding from BMS to perform this study. RTI Health Solutions is a unit of Research Triangle Institute, an independent, nonprofit, research organization that does work for govern. Tang:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lahue:BMS: Consultancy; Alkemi LLC: Current Employment. Nadal:BMS: Current Employment. Davis:RTI Health Solutions: Other: I am a full-time employee of RTI Health Solutions, which received research funding from BMS to perform this study. RTI Health Solutions is a unit of Research Triangle Institute, an independent, nonprofit, research organization that does work for govern; BMS, Astra Zeneca, Vertex, Novartis, Esai, United Therapeutics, Pfizer: Research Funding. Ajmera:RTI Health Solutions: Current Employment. Kee:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Abraham:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.071
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.071
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.015
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207