Power Management of Supercapacitors using Auxiliary Bank Switching for Hybrid Energy Storage Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hybridization of battery and supercapacitors (SCs) forms a highly effective energy storage system (ESS) for the electrified transportation that offers both energy and power at the same time as per the load requirements. However, the SC bank in hybrid ESS (HESS) deficits in delivering power for a longer duration to serve a higher number of transients. To reduce the burden on batteries and the overall system cost, a new auxiliary bank switching strategy for SCs with enhanced power delivery duration is introduced in this paper. A simple power management control is proposed to effectively switch the SCs from parallel to series combinations while serving the dynamic load demands. The key performance of the proposed circuit is holistically evaluated using PLECS simulations and a scaled-down laboratory prototype in terms of maximum power delivery time and SC cell energy utilization. The impact on passive components of the bi-directional converter with proposed architecture in terms of current stress is analyzed in detail. Finally, the suitability of the proposed architecture in HESS for an electric vehicle (EV) is verified on an OPAL-RT real-time simulator under a standard new European driving cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".