Thermal Performance of a Heated Pipe in the Presence of a Metal Foam and Twisted Tape Inserts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To meet the demand for more efficient ways of cooling and heating, new designs and further development of heat exchangers is essential in industry. The present study focuses on the thermal performance of a circular pipe with two inserts. The first insert consists of a porous medium having a porosity of 0.91, and the second one consists of a single twist solid insert. Different ranges of heating conditions have been applied for different flow rates. Water and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanofluid 1% vol are the liquid media used for cooling. Laminar flow is assumed for two different Reynolds numbers of 1000 and 2000. The results of the study have shown that the twisted tape insert increases the thermal efficiency of the pipe more than the porous media insert and the plain pipe. In addition, different temperature readings in the cross section of the pipe have indicated that the twisted tape helps mixing up the fluid and provides a constant temperature in the overall volume of the fluid, whereas for the porous media insert and plain pipe the fluid temperature increases in the fluid particles close to the pipe inner surface. TiO2 nanofluid exhibited an enhancement when compared to water for a plain and porous pipe. However, this enhancement was absent when a twisted insert is used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".