MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096088581 · doi:10.4025/notandum.vi54.52969

NOVAS VISÕES SOBRE A ROMA ANTIGA

2020· article· pt· W3096088581 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNotandum · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural, Media, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente estudo visa abordar questões relacionadas à recepção do passado romano na Cultura Pop atual, especificamente em dois nichos diferentes: dos Jogos Digitais (Games) e do RPG – Roleplaying Games (Jogos de Interpretação). Para esse fim, dois materiais serão objetos de análise: o game Assassin’s Creed Origins (2017), lançado pela Ubisoft Montreal, e o suplemento de RPG: Requiem for Rome (2007), publicado pela White Wolf. A escolha desses objetos se deu, principalmente pela relação estabelecida por eles mesmos com o período histórico, que é do interesse deste estudo, proclamando uma relação/ligação com o mundo romano. O objetivo desta análise é tecer algumas considerações sobre a produção desses objetos, sobretudo acerca do papel do historiador nas equipes de sua produção, observando também como certos temas aparecem/reaparecem com certa constância e levando em consideração os diferentes movimentos de aproximação e distanciamento da Historiografia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it