MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experiencia de aplicación del sistema SOLECON como herramienta tecnológica para la enseñanza de energías alternativas en niños de educación inicial

2020· article· es· W3096091803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcienciaDigital · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational methodologies and cognitive development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hoy en día se sabe que la estimulación temprana es un factor fundamental en el desarrollo de habilidades sociales en los niños de edad escolar mediante una gama amplia de actividades que inciden en su desarrollo integral y se ponen de manifiesto en su conducta. Siendo el ser humano un ser que resuelve sus necesidades básicas en relación con su entorno adquiriendo vínculos afectivos. El presente estudio examinó el papel de un tema complejo y el panorama para facilitar su doctrina en una muestra (N=30) de preescolares del Centro de Educación Inicial: “José Ernesto Vallejo”, ciudad Riobamba – Ecuador, a quienes se observó por un registro previamente estructurado. Del análisis se calificaron cualitativamente tres parámetros dentro de su competencia cognitiva: Iniciado, en Proceso y Adquirido, lo cual permitieron entender mejor, como a través del uso de estas herramientas se puede enseñar lúdicamente una ciencia dificultosa de aprender a temprana edad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it