MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Empowering her guardians to nurture our oceans future

2020· preprint· en· W3096118122 on OpenAlexaff
Mibu Fischer, Kimberley H. Maxwell, Per Ole Frederiksen, Halfdan Pedersen, Dean Greeno, Nang Jingwas, Jamie Graham-Blair, Sutej Hugu, Tero Mustonen, Eero Murtomäki, Kaisu Mustonen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsAssembly of First Nations
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNature versus nurtureEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceBiologyPhilosophyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coastal Indigenous and Traditional Peoples communities are starting to see changes to their lives from climate change, whether this is from species range change or displacement from land changes. For many of these communities the ability to adequately adapt to these changes is limited by the governance structures they are required to live within, which differ from their customary practices and culture. A group of Indigenous and Traditional Peoples attended the Future Seas 2030 workshop in November 2019 and discussed the consequences of climate change along with the biggest barriers for their communities to contribute towards more sustainable future using traditional knowledge that will benefit all of earth's people. The aim of this was to highlight and give voice to the various backgrounds and real-life situations impacting on some of the world's Indigenous and Traditional Peoples whose connection with the oceans and coasts have been disrupted. The paper raises issues of oppression, colonisation, language and agency on why it has been difficult for these groups to contribute to the current management of oceans and coasts, and asks scientists and practitioners in this space to become allies to enable the needed shift for earth's guardians to take a leading role in nurturing her for our future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.020
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207