MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096152915 · doi:10.1016/j.imr.2020.100689

Corrigendum to “Rapid review protocol: Zinc for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 and other coronavirus-related respiratory tract infections” [Integr Med Res 9 (2020): 100457]

2020· erratum· en· W3096152915 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Hunter, Susan Arentz, Joshua Z. Goldenberg, Guoyan Yang, Jennifer Beardsley, Dominik Mertz, Stephen Leeder

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrative Medicine Research · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)CoronavirusMedicineRespiratory tractSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakProtocol (science)VirologyZincRespiratory systemChemistryInternal medicinePathologyDiseaseAlternative medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100457.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.142
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.142
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0100.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4050.186

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.303
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrative Medicine ResearchSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207