Recipe for an epidemic: Environmental perspectives on the 1885 smallpox epidemic and historical anti-vaccination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When smallpox swept through Montreal in 1885, many refused the vaccine that may have spared 3,000 lives and prevented at least 19,905 other cases. Thus far, the epidemic’s literature has linked anti-vaccination sentiment to the linguistic and ethnic identity of Montreal’s French-Canadian Catholic population. This project seeks to deconstruct how class and its impact on the urban environment of Montreal affected anti-vaccination protest. In a rapidly industrializing and urbanizing city, working-class Montrealers living in abject conditions during the epidemic met the smallpox pathogen on their own terms and dealt with it traditionally. Failures of municipal health authorities to appeal and cooperate with this vulnerable demographic and address their concerns led to anti-vaccination sentiment, and even riots. By viewing class, language, and ethnicity-nationality as separate though intersecting aspects of French-Canadian identity, this project seeks to deconstruct culturally deterministic justifications for vaccine rejection and reintegrate environmental concerns in the epidemic’s narrative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".