MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096203623 · doi:10.3138/ctr.184.012

A Sonic Journey with Alex Bulmer

2020· article· en· W3096203623 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Megan Johnson, Moynan King

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArtistic and Creative Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsConversationVisual artsAsideFormative assessmentPerformance artParallelsArtTRACE (psycholinguistics)Sound artSituatedPerspective (graphical)Active listeningSociologyMedia studiesArt historyLiteraturePedagogyEngineeringCommunicationLinguisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alex Bulmer is a blind multidisciplinary artist who has worked extensively in Canada and the United Kingdom. Aside from her work as an actor, musician, video artist, and playwright, Alex is known for her work in disability arts and advocacy. Recently, she has been involved in curating formative disability arts events, including The Republic of Inclusion (2015) with the National Arts Centre and Cripping the Arts (2019) at Harbourfront Centre. In the following conversation, we explore the genesis of her connection to sound and trace the trajectory of her sound-based performance work in music, film, theatre, and experimental performance. We also discuss Alex’s unique perspective on the intimate nature of listening, her distinction between noise and sound, and her connection to the human voice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicArtistic and Creative ResearchFrench-language works237,207