MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096219420 · doi:10.21608/auej.2020.120376

HUMANIZING CITIES BETWEEN REALITY AND APPLICATION

2020· article· en· W3096219420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed A. Ibrahim, Mohamed Abdel Hamid

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationModernityAestheticsArchitectural engineeringEntertainmentSociologyOrder (exchange)Urban designBeautyUrban planningCentralityEnvironmental ethicsBusinessPolitical scienceCivil engineeringEngineeringVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Man has occupied a central role in building the city and setting up Civilization in general in order to harness all the capabilities of civilization and nature and even what the city produces to serve him and to meet his needs. The idea of ​​human centrality has continued and still dominates the philosophy of establishing and building cities. It is agreed that urban design and planning processes aim to create a concrete (built) environment in line with the requirements, needs, and behaviors of its users. Studies have shown that urban spaces that do not satisfy the social and entertainment requirements of users lead to negative effects on those individuals (environmental, behavioral, economic, social & cultural), which may lead to: either abandoning these urban spaces or trying to make adjustments to them in line with their requirements and behaviors or individuals acquire new behaviors to cope with these voids, which leads to urban environment deformation and the loss of the job for which it was designed. From this standpoint, this research is concerned with presenting the direction of humanizing cities. Attention to this direction came after it became clear that the design of cities in most Arab societies was not to serve man in the first place, but was designed to serve the car, instead. When we look at our cities from the plane we see them beautiful and dazzling, while when we get closer to them on the ground, we do not feel any details of this beauty, as if all theories of modernity in urban planning that equated the environment and society of the Arab city with its counterparts in northern Canada or in the jungles of Africa .were only a trick Those theories did not take inspiration from the concepts of our traditional cities, as they have nothing to do with our environment, customs & traditions, and do not take in consideration the rectifiers of our history and present. Actually, we shall worry now about the future, as many chronic diseases and social customs have appeared and spread as a result of those designs. The research had reached the elements of the human city and mentioned some examples of achieving humanization of the city in many countries, whether they are Western or Middle East countries. This can help in designing and planning the city in a way that provides human needs and requirements and helps increasing user's satisfaction. The research had also given illustrative summary of the recommendations, directives, and associated rates. احتل الإنسان دورا ً مرکزیا ً فی بناء المدینة وفی صناعة الحضارة عموما ً لیسخر کل مقدرات الحضارة والطبیعة وما تنتجه المدینة لخدمته وتلبیة احتیاجاته. من المتفق علیه أن عملیات التصمیم والتخطیط العمرانی تهدف إلی تکوین بیئة مادیة تتماشی مع متطلبات واحتیاجات وسلوکیات المستخدمین لها. وقد أوضحت الدراسات أن المدن التی لا تشبع للمستخدمین متطلباتهم تؤدى إلی تأثیرات سلبیة ( بیئیة، سلوکیة، اقتصادیة، اجتماعیة، ثقافیة ) علی هؤلاء الأفراد مما قد یؤدی إلی هجر تلک الفراغات العمرانیة أو محاولة إدخال تعدیلات علیها لتتماشی مع متطلباتهم وسلوکیاتهم أو اکتساب الأفراد سلوکیات جدیدة لیتأقلموا مع تلک الفراغات، مما یؤدی إلی حدوث تشوه فی البیئة المادیة وفقدانها لوظیفتها التی صممت من أجلها. من هذا المنطلق، یهتم هذا البحث بتقدیم اتجاه انسنة المدن وقد جاء الاهتمام بهذا الاتجاه بعد أن اتضح أن تصمیم المدن فی أغلب المجتمعات العربیة لم یکن لیخدم الإنسان فی الأصل، بل صمم لیخدم السیارة. تلک التصمیمات لم تستلهم مفاهیم مدننا التقلیدیة، فهی تصمیمات لا تمت إلى بیئتنا وعاداتنا وتقالیدنا بصلة، ولا تراعی مقومات تاریخنا وحاضرنا، والخوف الآن على المستقبل فکم من الأمراض المزمنة والعادات الاجتماعیة التی ظهرت وانتشرت نتیجة تلک التصامیم. وقد حاول البحث الوصول إلى عناصر المدینة الإنسانیة واهم المبادئ التی یبنى علیها اتجاه انسنة المدن وذکر عددا من الأمثلة التی قامت بتطبیق بعض مبادئ انسنة المدینة فی العدید من الدول سواء کانت دول غربیة أو فی الشرق الأوسط وهذا ما یمکن أن یساعد فی تصمیم وتخطیط المدینة بالشکل الذی یوفر احتیاجات الإنسان ومتطلباته وتساعد على زیادة رضا المستخدمین.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.037
Scholarly communication0.0240.019
Open science0.0020.018
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Al-Azhar University Engineering SectorSame topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207