MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3096257583 · doi:10.1101/2020.10.29.20207167

Gastroenterological and Hepatic Manifestations of Patients with COVID-19, Prevalence, Mortality by Country, and Intensive Care Admission Rate: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020· preprint· en· W3096257583 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Shehab, Fatema Alrashed, Sameera Shuaibi, Dhuha Alajmi, Alan Barkun

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCase fatality rateMeta-analysisDiarrheaNauseaCohort studyCohortSubgroup analysisAbdominal painSystematic reviewMortality rateMEDLINEEpidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background & Aims Patient infected with the SARS-COV2 usually report fever and respiratory symptoms. However, multiple gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations such as diarrhea and abdominal pain has been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GI, liver function test (LFT) abnormalities, and mortality of COVID-19 patients. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that included cohort of patients infected with SARS-COV2 from December 1 st , 2019 to July 1 st , 2020. We collected data from the cohort of patients with COVID-19 by conducting a literature search using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane according to the preferred reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We analyzed pooled data on the prevalence of overall and individual gastrointestinal symptoms, LFTs abnormalities and performed subanalyses to investigate the relationship between gastrointestinal symptoms, geographic location, fatality, and ICU admission. Results The available data of 17,802 positive patients for SARS-COV2 from 120 studies were included in our analysis. The most frequent manifestations were diarrhea (13.3%, 95% CI 12-16), nausea (9.1%, 95% CI 9-13) and elevated LFTs (23.7%, 95% CI 21- 27). The overall and GI fatality were 7.2% (95% CI 6 -10), and 1% (95% CI 1- 4) respectively. Subgroup analysis showed non statistically significant associations between GI symptoms/LFTs abnormalities and ICU admissions (OR=3.41, 95% CI 0.87 – 13.4). The GI mortality rate was 0.58% in China and 3.5% in the United States (95% CI 2 - 5). Conclusion Digestive symptoms and LFTs abnormalities are common in COVID-19 patients. Our subanalysis shows that the presence of gastrointestinal and liver manifestations does not appear to affect mortality, or ICU admission rate. However, the mortality rate was higher in the United States compared to China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.040
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→