MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096278560 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-133916

Long-Term Follow-up of Ibrutinib Treatment for Rituximab-Refractory Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis of the Open-Label Substudy of the Phase 3 iNNOVATETM Trial

2020· article· en· W3096278560 on OpenAlexaffabout
Judith Trotman, Christian Buske, Alessandra Tedeschi, Jeffrey Matous, D. Blair Macdonald, Constantine S. Tam, Olivier Tournilhac, Shuo Ma, Steven P. Treon, Albert Oriol, Jerry Ping, Eva M. Briso, Israel Arango‐Hisijara, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRituximabIbrutinibWaldenstrom macroglobulinemiaInternal medicineMacroglobulinemiaGastroenterologyRefractory (planetary science)NeutropeniaProgression-free survivalPhases of clinical researchMedian follow-upSurgeryOncologyClinical trialChemotherapyLymphomaLeukemiaMultiple myelomaChronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background : Ibrutinib is the only once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the US and EU either as single-agent therapy or in combination with rituximab for treatment of patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) across all lines of therapy. The open-label substudy of the phase 3 iNNOVATE trial (PCYC-1127; NCT02165397) demonstrated that single-agent ibrutinib was highly efficacious (90% overall response rate [ORR] per investigator) with improved responses over time in heavily pretreated, rituximab-refractory patients with WM (Buske Blood 2018). Here, we present results from the final analysis of the iNNOVATE open-label substudy. Methods : Patients with WM who failed to achieve at least a minor response (MR) or who relapsed <12 months after their last rituximab-containing therapy received once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and ORR (≥MR) per Independent Review Committee (IRC), overall survival (OS), hemoglobin (Hgb) improvement, and safety; serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) reduction was also assessed. Results : Thirty-one patients with rituximab-refractory disease were enrolled; median age was 67 years (range 47-90), and median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 1-7). Median baseline Hgb was 103 g/L (range 64-146). Median baseline IgM was 39 g/L (range 9-107). Median follow-up was 58 months (range 9-61). Median PFS was 39 months (95% CI 25-NE); the PFS rate at 60 months was 40%. Median PFS was not reached (95% CI 27-NE) in patients with the MYD88L265P/CXCR4WT genotype and was 18 months (95% CI 3-28) in patients with the MYD88L265P/CXCR4WHIM genotype. ORR was 87%, with similar ORR observed across genetic subtypes (MYD88L265P/CXCR4WT, 88% [15/17]; MYD88L265P/CXCR4WHIM, 86% [6/7]); major response rates (≥PR) among these genotypes were 88% (15/17) and 71% (5/7), respectively (Figure 1A). Median OS was not reached in the full cohort of patients, regardless of number of prior therapies (1-2 vs ≥3). Improvements in IgM and Hgb were generally rapid and sustained (Figure 1B). Twenty-two patients (71%) had sustained improvement in Hgb, including 17/21 (81%) with baseline Hgb ≤110 g/L. Median change in IgM from baseline to nadir (month 54) was -37 g/L (range -75 to -5). Median duration of ibrutinib treatment was 41 months. The most common reason for discontinuing ibrutinib while on study was progressive disease (42%). At time of study closure, 14 patients (45%) remained on treatment; of these, 6 went on to receive ibrutinib in the commercial setting and 8 enrolled in a treatment extension study. Overall, 97% of patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most commonly diarrhea (48%; grade ≥2, 13%) and pyrexia (35%; grade ≥2, 6%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 81% of patients; the most common were neutropenia (16%), hypertension (10%), and anemia (10%). No deaths occurred due to AEs, and no patients died while on treatment. Ibrutinib dose was reduced in 5 patients (16%) due to an AE, and 2 patients (6%) discontinued treatment because of an AE. No patients experienced major hemorrhage or atrial fibrillation. Conclusions : In this final analysis of the open-label substudy of the iNNOVATE trial, single-agent ibrutinib continued to show sustained efficacy in patients who had heavily pretreated, rituximab-refractory WM. Responses to ibrutinib were consistent across genotypes, although subgroup numbers were small. Ibrutinib maintained a manageable safety profile, and no new safety signals were identified with over 5 years of overall follow-up. Disclosures Trotman: Celgene: Research Funding; PCYC: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Buske:Roche, Janssen, Bayer, MSD: Research Funding; Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Celltrion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tedeschi:BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Department of Hematology Niguarda Hospital Milano: Current Employment; Sunesis: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen spa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Matous:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy. MacDonald:Roche Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Tam:BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tournilhac:INNATE Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Grant; ABBVIE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travle grant. Ma:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Research Funding. Treon:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; BeiGene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; BioGene: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding. Oriol:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ping:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Briso:Pharmacyclics GmbH, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Arango-Hisijara:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dimopoulos:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207