MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096285794 · doi:10.1093/isle/isaa155

Infiltration and Efficacy: A Performance Analysis of Ecoactivism in the Age of Corporate Hegemony

2020· article· en· W3096285794 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhalingCitizen journalismWitnessPolitical scienceEnvironmental protectionGeographyLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1971, the group that would eventually become Greenpeace attempted to sail from Vancouver to Amchitka Island—twice—to witness and protest the American nuclear testing taking place on the island. The global media attention that the effort garnered motivated the United States to end the testing and restore the island to a bird sanctuary (Durland 67–68). Since that time, Greenpeace has become one of the largest and most influential environmental nongovernmental organizations in the world with offices covering operations in “more than 55 countries” and a purported 2.5 million individual donors (Greenpeace, “Who We Are”). The group relies heavily on direct action in its work against nuclear proliferation, whaling, toxic waste mismanagement, single-use plastics, and a host of other environmental issues; these actions are often so dramatic that Greenpeace has been theorized as a guerrilla theater company (Durland 68). In 2015, Greenpeace launched the Detox Outdoor campaign in an effort to eliminate the use of perflourinated and polyflourinated compounds (PFCs) from the supply chain of major outdoor brands like The North Face, Columbia, and Patagonia. PFCs are chemicals that are often used in waterproofing for outdoor products like jackets, gloves, and sleeping bags: they have been shown to accumulate inside the body of living organisms, been detected in the bloodstream of humans, and are linked to reproductive disorders (Cobbing et al. 2). In this multifaceted campaign, the group relied heavily on performance-based actions, including an online meme action in which activists posed nude in extreme environments and held banners with messaging directed at the companies, storefront occupations in which activists placed themselves in front of and in the display windows of retailers wearing nothing but boxes printed with messaging criticizing the companies’ behavior, and two separate performance hikes that illustrated (1) the presence of PFCs in the environment and (2) the possibility of a world without them, respectively. In 2017, Greenpeace declared victory when Gore Fabrics—a major supplier for all of these outdoor brands—committed to eliminating hazardous PFCs from every part of their supply chain by 2023 (Greenpeace, “You Did It!”). In this campaign, it seems, performance worked—it did something.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it