MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096332730 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3034748

PSO-Based Modeling and Analysis of Electrical Characteristics of Photovoltaic Module Under Nonuniform Snow Patterns

2020· article· en· W3096332730 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Khenar, Shamsodin Taheri, Ana-Maria Creţu, Seyedkazem Hosseini, Edris Pouresmaeil

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemMaximum power point trackingComputer scienceSnowElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Nonlinear systemEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a novel universal multi-zone approach of photovoltaic (PV) modeling is proposed to determine the electrical characteristics of PV modules covered with nonuniform snow patterns under partial shading conditions. A precise estimation of the penetrating light into the snow layer on the surface of PV modules is obtained through the theory of Giddings and LaChapelle based on the physical and optical properties of the accreted snow. The single-diode-five-parameter equivalent circuit model of the PV unit is considered as the platform for the modeling approach. Original contributions are brought through: (1) the use of a contour-based discretization methodology that can separate any nonlinear PV characteristics to the multiple linear ones; (2) a swarm-based optimization methodology that is adapted to instantaneously update and evaluate the output characteristics of PV modules and (3) a power loss equation to represent the performance of non-uniformly-covered snowy PV panels. The proposed model was successfully tested using three different commercial types of PV technologies commonly used in North America. The accuracy of the proposed modeling approach for power loss determination was validated by processing real data of a 12-MW grid-connected PV farm. Due to the high extent of snow impact on the PV losses, the proposed model of PV modules could be regarded as a basis not only for analyzing PV plant performance, but also for optimizing the power converter design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207