Evolutionary optimization of neural network to predict sediment transport without sedimentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sedimentation in open channels occurs frequently and is relative to system inflow. The long-term retention of sediments on channel beds can increase the possibility of variations in deposits and their eventual consolidation. This study compares three hybrid artificial intelligence methods in estimating sediment transport without sedimentation (STWS). We employed the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) methods in combination with the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to overcome the weakness of ANN training with conventional algorithms. We used the ICA, GA and PSO methods to optimize the weights of the ANN layers. Using dimensional analysis, we placed the effective parameters in predicting sediment transport into five non-dimensional groups. Six models are proposed and run using three hybrid methods (18 models in total). As the comparisons demonstrate, the proposed combined models are more accurate than ANN and existing equations in estimating the densimetric Froude number (Fr). However, we found the ICA–ANN superior to GA–ANN and PSO–ANN, as it produces explicit solutions to the problem. The ICA–ANN has the lowest prediction uncertainty band for Fr of all developed models. Moreover, the variation trend of the Fr for all input variables (except overall friction factor of sediment) is a second-order polynomial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".