MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096465899 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.569370

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Interaction With Swine Endothelial Cells

2020· article· en· W3096465899 on OpenAlexaff
Berenice Plasencia-Muñoz, Francisco Javier Avelar-González, Mireya de la Garza, Mario Jacques, Adriana C. Moreno-Flores, Alma L. Guerrero-Barrera

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsActinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeBiologyMicrobiologyVirologySerotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Actinobacillus pleuropneumonia is an exclusive swine respiratory tract pathogen and the etiological agent of swine pleuropneumonia which affects pigs of all ages and has high rates of morbidity and mortality which generates large economic losses for the pig industry. It is a widely studied bacterium, however its pathogenesis is not yet fully understood. The prevalence of the 18 serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae varies by geographic region, with serotypes 1, 3, 5b and 7 being the most prevalent in North America and more specifically in Mexico. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is described as a strict extracellular pathogen with tropism for lower respiratory tract. However, this study describes the ability of these serotypes to adhere to non-phagocytic cells, using as cell model endothelial cells which are in close contact with alveolar cells in respiratory tract, as well as their ability to invade them, indicating that it is both an extra and intracellular pathogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207