MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapeando festas do Espírito Santo no Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil) e no Quebec (Canadá)

2020· article· pt· W3096546010 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterfaces Brasil/Canadá · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho é um relato de uma primeira tentativa para aproximar duas pesquisas paralelas sobre Festas do Espírito Santo no Grande do Sul (Brasil) e no Quebec (Canadá). No Sul do Brasil, esta celebração remonta ao século XVIII e no Quebec, à década de 1970. Nosso questionamento se direcionou para os contornos e especificidades que assumiu nestes espaços. A partir do seu mapeamento, tecemos considerações sobre sua entrada no Rio Grande do Sul e no Quebec, suas características, função social e simbólica. Percebemos que estas últimas estão relacionadas com a construção e reconstrução de identidades em diáspora e com a mediação entre o mundo dos homens e o espiritual – o do Espírito Santo. Em destaque, nestas duas pesquisas, a busca da identidade pela Festa e da autenticidade da Festa, esta última mais marcada no Brasil devido à distância no tempo e no espaço da Festa original açoriana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it