MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Interactive Aerosol Feedbacks on Photolysis Rates in the GEM-MACH Air Quality Model for an Athabasca Oil-Sands Modelling Study

2020· article· en· W3096640784 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mahtab Majdzadeh, Craig Stroud, Ayodeji Akingunola, Paul A. Makar, Christopher E. Sioris, C. A. McLinden, Xiaoyi Zhao, Michael D. Moran, Ihab Abboud

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolRadiative transferAtmospheric radiative transfer codesEnvironmental scienceSingle-scattering albedoAtmospheric sciencesChemistryMeteorologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The radiative transfer module of an on-line chemical transport models requires input data from aerosol extinction efficiency, single scatter albedo and asymmetry factor, in order to predict the radiative state of the atmosphere. These aerosol optical properties (aerosol optical depth, AOD), may be integrated vertically for comparison to satellite observations. These optical effects may also influence the shorter wavelengths associated with atmospheric gas photolysis, influencing atmospheric reactivity. These processes may be harmonized in an on-line reaction transport model, such as Environment and Climate Change Canada’s GEM-MACH (GEM: Global Environmental Multi-scale – MACH: Modelling Air quality and Chemistry). Previous photolysis routine in the radiative transfer module, MESSY-JVAL (Modular Earth Sub-Model System), in GEM-MACH, made use of a climatology of aerosol optical properties, and the previous on-line version made use of a homogeneous mixture Mie code for meteorological radiative transfer calculations. We calculated a new lookup table for the extinction efficiency, absorption and scattering cross sections of each aerosol type. The new version of MESSY-JVAL uses GEM-MACH predicted aerosol size distributions, chemical composition and relative humidity in each vertical column at each time step as input, reads aerosol absorption and scattering cross section data from the new lookup table and calculates aerosol optical properties, that are then used to modify both photolysis and meteorological radiative transfer calculations. In order to evaluate these modifications to the model, we performed a series of simulations with GEM-MACH with wildfire emissions inputs from the Canadian Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System (CFFEPS) and compared the model AOD output with satellite and AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) measurement data. Comparison of the hourly AERONET and monthly-averaged satellite AOD demonstrates major improvements in the revised model AOD predictions. The impact of the updated photolysis rates and meteorological radiative transfer calculations on predictions of oxidant mixing ratios and rates of pollutant oxidation (nitrogen dioxide conversion to nitric acid) will be assessed both within and below the forest fire plume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→