MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096699133 · doi:10.21873/anticanres.14632

<i>TYRO3</i>Truncation Resulting From a t(10;15)(p11;q15) Chromosomal Translocation in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2020· article· en· W3096699133 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Brunetti, Bernward Zeller, Anne Tierens, Sverre Heim, Francesca Micci, Ioannis Panagopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueAnticancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromosomal translocationCancer researchMyeloid leukemiaBiologyMyeloidBone marrowExonLeukemiaCancerGeneticsImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/AIM: Novel acquired chromosome aberrations in cancer may provide insights into pathogenetic mechanisms, be of diagnostic and/or prognostic significance and pave the way for new modes of therapeutic intervention. Here, we report a novel chromosome translocation and its molecular genetic consequences in a pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) case. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytogenetic, RNA sequencing, and molecular analyses were performed on the bone marrow cells of a child with AML. RESULTS: The patient entered complete hematologic remission after treatment according to the NOPHO-AML 2004 protocol. A novel t(10;15)(p11;q15) translocation was found in leukemic cells at diagnosis resulting in a fusion of exon 13 of TYRO3 with a sequence from 10p11. The transcript codes for a putative TYRO3 protein lacking the tyrosine kinase domain. CONCLUSION: The t(10;15)(p11;q15) translocation in neoplastic bone marrow cells results in truncated TYRO3. Because the role of the truncated TYRO3 cannot be predicted functional studies are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnticancer ResearchSame topicPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationFrench-language works237,207