Bidirectional Resonant CLLC Charger for Wide Battery Voltage Range: Asymmetric Parameters Methodology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CLLC bidirectional resonant converter has significant potential in battery chargers and dc microgrids, due to its bidirectional power transfer capability. To ensure uniform characteristics for bidirectional operation, secondary LC resonant tank components are usually designed to equal the primary LC components after reflection. This conventional design method is regarded as the symmetric design. It is used in applications where wide voltage regulation is not required, such as CLLC dc transformers. However, for bidirectional battery charger applications, the battery has a wide voltage range variation, and gain requirements during charging and discharging are different. These asymmetric characteristics could lead to undesirable large switching frequency range if a conventional symmetric CLLC design is employed. To address this issue, a detailed asymmetric parameters methodology (APM) is proposed in this article. It can design gain curves for charging and discharging modes separately. This enables overlapping of the switching frequency range for both modes, thereby reducing the bidirectional frequency range variation. It brings lower switching loss caused by excessive high frequency, and relieve the extra conduction loss and current stress of power switches as well. Finally, a detailed analysis of the proposed APM is provided and validated with simulations and experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it