MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096792242

Intelligent Hierarchical Modal Control of a Novel Manipulator with Slewing and Deployable Links

2002· article· en· W3096792242 on OpenAlexaff
V. J. Modi, J. Zhang, C. W. de Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueIAF abstracts, 34th COSPAR Scientific Assembly · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModalController (irrigation)Control engineeringControl theory (sociology)Revolute jointVibrationHierarchical control systemFuzzy logicFuzzy control systemEngineeringComputer scienceIntelligent controlControl (management)Artificial intelligenceRobot
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present study focuses on the development and implementation of an intelligent hierarchical controller for the vibration control of a deployable manipulator. The emphasis is on the use of knowledge-based tuning of the low-level controller so as to improve the performance of the system. To this end, first a fuzzy inference system (FIS) is developed. The FIS is then combined with a conventional modal controller to construct a hierarchical control system. Specifically, a knowledge-based fuzzy system is used to tune the parameters of the modal controller. The effectiveness of the hierarchical control system is investigated through numerical simulation studies. Realistic examples are considered where the system experiences vibrations due to initial disturbances at the flexible revolute joint or due to maneuvers of a deployable manipulator. The results show that the knowledge-based hierarchical control system is quite effective in suppressing vibrations induced due to the above mentioned disturbances. Results suggest that performance of the modal controller could be significantly improved through knowledge-based tuning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIAF abstracts, 34th COSPAR Scientific AssemblySame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207