MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096824524 · doi:10.1002/mds.28364

A New <scp>MRI</scp> Measure to Early Differentiate Progressive Supranuclear Palsy From De Novo Parkinson's Disease in Clinical Practice: An International Study

2020· article· en· W3096824524 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Quattrone, Angelo Antonini, David E. Vaillancourt, Klaus Seppi, Roberto Ceravolo, Antonio P. Strafella, Maurizio Morelli, Salvatore Nigro, Basilio Vescio, Maria Giovanna Bianco, Roberta Vasta, Pier Paolo Arcuri, Luca Weis, Eleonora Fiorenzato, Roberta Biundo, Roxana G. Burciu, Florian Krismer, Nikolaus R. McFarland, Christoph Mueller, Elke R. Gizewski, Mirco Cosottini, Eleonora Del Prete, Sonia Mazzucchi, Aldo Quattrone

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsThird ventricleProgressive supranuclear palsyCohortMedicineReceiver operating characteristicParkinson's diseaseArea under the curveInternal medicineParkinsonismCardiologyNuclear medicineRadiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Enlargement of the third ventricle has been reported in atypical parkinsonism. We investigated whether the measurement of third ventricle width could distinguish Parkinson's disease (PD) from progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). METHODS: We assessed a new MR T1-weighted measurement (third ventricle width/internal skull diameter) in a training cohort of 268 participants (98 PD, 73 PSP, 98 controls from our center) and in a testing cohort of 291 participants (82 de novo PD patients and 133 controls from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative, 76 early-stage PSP from an international research group). PD diagnosis was confirmed after a 4-year follow-up. Diagnostic performance of the third ventricle/internal skull diameter was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve with bootstrapping; the area under the curve of the training cohort was compared with the area under the curve of the testing cohort using the De Long test. RESULTS: In both cohorts, third ventricle/internal skull diameter values did not differ between PD and controls but were significantly lower in PD than in PSP patients (P < 0.0001). In PD, third ventricle/internal skull diameter values did not change significantly between baseline and follow-up evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis accurately differentiated PD from PSP in the training cohort (area under the curve, 0.94; 95% CI, 91.1-97.6; cutoff, 5.72) and in the testing cohort (area under the curve, 0.91; 95% CI, 87.0-97.0; cutoff,: 5.88), validating the generalizability of the results. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a new reliable and validated MRI measurement for the early differentiation of PD and PSP. The simplicity and generalizability of this biomarker make it suitable for routine clinical practice and for selection of patients in clinical trials worldwide. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207