MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Manitoba Converter based Bi-directional On-board charger for Plug-in Electric Vehicles

2020· article· en· W3096864110 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Avishek Ghosh, Carl Ngai Man Ho, Ken King Man Siu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersResearch Manitoba
KeywordsGalvanic isolationBattery chargerElectrical engineeringTransformerBattery (electricity)Computer scienceGridElectric vehicleBattery packVoltageInverterTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) battery chargers only allow unidirectional power conversion from grid to the PEV battery hence cannot be used for "Vehicle-to-Grid" functionality in smart grid applications. PEV batteries from different automobile manufacturers come with different charging requirements. Moreover, the grid conditions may vary depending on the charging location. Hence, an universal, dual-stage on-board charger topology is presented that can achieve efficient bidirectional power conversion with a wide input and output voltage range to suit charging requirement of different PEV batteries. The first stage is based on a Manitoba converter, which is a grid-connected converter with bridgeless buck-boost topology that can act as a rectifier or inverter depending on the mode of operation in an extensive range of input-output voltage. The second stage is a high frequency transformer based Dual Active Bridge DC/DC converter to provide galvanic isolation and facilitate bidirectional power flow. The operation of the proposed system is successfully verified in simulation environment as well as its performance experimentally verified by implementation of a 800W hardware prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207