MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096877361 · doi:10.11159/cdsr20.129

Sensor Fusion INS/GNSS based on Fuzzy Logic Weighted KalmanFilter

2020· article· en· W3096877361 on OpenAlexaff
G. G. Cunto, Jurek Z. Sąsiadek

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and Robotics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterGNSS applicationsFuzzy logicSensor fusionComputer scienceFusionArtificial intelligenceGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Fuzzy Logic Adaptive Control (FLAC) is used to adjust the exponential weighting parameter of a weighted Error-State Kalman Filter (ESKF) in an INS/GNSS system. The FLAC is used to prevent the Kalman Filter (KF) from diverging or to reach to a high bound when the IMU produces colored noise. Furthermore, a matrix notation for the weighting parameter alpha is introduced and compared against the single alpha value. First, the results show the influence of a colored noise in the system, which makes the ESKF reaching a large error bound solution. The application of FLAC considering both constant and matrix alpha reduces the error boundary for the position and velocity states. However, the constant alpha leads to an inaccurate altitude, bias correction, and error covariance matrix. The matrix alpha parameter shows a final solution that improves the navigation accuracy for all states, preserving the stability of the error covariance matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and RoboticsSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207