MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aporte metodológico de la educación física, fortaleciendo la lectoescritura en los estudiantes de segundo EGB.

2020· article· es· W3096878461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcienciaDigital · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cuando un ciudadano ecuatoriano puede recordar a sus profesores de la escuela, por nombre, es porque ellos hicieron un gran aporte a su formación, como estudiante, alfabetizándolo. Es importante la enseñanza de la Lectoescritura en el segundo año e Educación Básica y que en esa etapa sea bien aprendida ya que de ahí se parte para los futuros aprendizajes de Lengua y Literatura que se desarrollaran durante toda la vida estudiantil, pero en esta ocasión se pretende motivar a los estudiantes a realizar un eficiente aprendizaje de manera recreativa fortalecida desde las clases de Educación física realizando un trabajo en conjunto con la docente del aula con el único fin que es permitirle al estudiante un aprendizaje integrador y motivador.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it