MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096915959 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11296

The Design and Experimental Analysis of an Air Source Heat Pump for Extreme Cold Weather Operation

2016· dissertation· en· W3096915959 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tom Mackintosh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat pumpCoefficient of performanceBackupAir source heat pumpsStage (stratigraphy)SolverEnvironmental scienceRange (aeronautics)MeteorologyEngineeringSimulationNuclear engineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat pumps offer the potential for significant energy savings in residential applications if they are implemented properly.Currently, air source heat pumps have limited performance at outdoor temperatures below -5 • C and most are unable to operate at outdoor temperatures below -15 • C.This means less efficient backup heating systems are necessary to meet heating requirements which has impeded widespread use of this technology in Canadian climates.This research evaluates one method of increasing the performance of an air sourced heat pump to extend its operating range and eliminate the need for a backup heating system.A study was conducted using the Engineering Equation Solver software package to identify the performance improvements that are attainable with variations of a two stage heat pump cycle.An experimental apparatus was constructed to compare the performance of the best performing variation -a two stage economized cycle -to that of a traditional single stage heat pump.The two stage economized heat pump had a measured coefficient of performance of 1.45 when it was operated at an outdoor temperature of -31 • C making it an energy efficient option for most Canadian climates.In addition, the heating capacity of the system was increased by a factor of 2.5 when compared to the single stage system.• C Degrees Celsius Ω Electrical resistance Hz Frequency (Hertz) g Grams J Joules L Litres m Metres min Minutes rpm Revolutions per minute rev Revolutions s Seconds Vac Voltage -alternating current Vdc Voltage -direct current V Voltage W Watts xii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207