MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096918794 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-134393

Clinical Characteristics and Follow-up Post-Surgery of Women with Bia-ALCL Operated at a Single Institution

2020· article· en· W3096918794 on OpenAlexaff
Paola Ghione, Joshua Vorstenbosch, Peter G. Cordeiro, Maria E. Arcila, Alison J. Moskowitz, Colette Owens, Natasha Galasso, Jonas A. Nelson, Ahmet Doǧan, Colleen M. McCarthy, Steven M. Horwitz

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Implant and Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeromaAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaSurgeryBreast implantImplantRadiation therapyBreast cancerCancerMastectomyLymphomaInternal medicineComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare subtype of ALCL that arises as a seroma or a mass in the space surrounding textured breast implants. In July 2019 the FDA had reported 573 cases worldwide and 33 deaths connected to the lymphoma. However, collections of cases usually come from large groups of institutions or countries, with different approaches regarding surgery and treatment. Here we describe a cohort of 18 cases undergoing implant removal and capsulectomy and followed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Methods We retrospectively analyzed all the cases of women with breast implants undergoing implant removal and capsulectomy for BIA-ALCL at MSKCC from January 2011 to June 2020. Results are expressed in absolute numbers and percentages, survival is calculated with the Kaplan Maier method. Results Of 27 total BIA-ALCL cases seen at MSKCC, 18 women had their primary surgery for implant removal and capsulectomy by our surgery division, analyzed in our central pathology and treated and/or expectantly monitored in our T cell lymphoma clinic. Sixteen patients (89%) had implants as reconstruction after breast cancer (of which 12/16, 75% had received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), 3, 19% radiotherapy (RT). Two subjects (11%) had implants for cosmetic reasons). Four patients (25%) had undergone implants exchange after initial reconstruction. BRCA mutational status was known in 9 patients (56%), with 3/9 women (33%) having BRCA mutations (2 BRCA2, 1 BRCA1) and one additional woman initially thought to have a mutation of BRCA2, subsequently re-classified as polymorphism. After a median exposure of 11 years (STDEV 6 y), 10 years from last implant change, median age at BIA-ALCL diagnosis was 57 years (STDEV 10 y). Implant characteristics were as follows: 18/18 (100%) silicone surface, 17/18 (94%) had a biocell textured surface, 1/18 (6%) unknown surface, 9/18 (50%) silicone filled, and 9/18 (50%) saline filled. BIA-ALCL presented as effusion in 14/18 (78%) of cases, mass in 3/18 (17%) of cases, and PET+ intramammary lymphadenopathy in 1/18 (6%). Pre-surgery, cases were assessed with PET/CT in 15/18 (83%), US in 15/18 (83%) and MR in 7/18 (39%). Initial treatment was implant removal and capsulectomy for all women, with removal of all the implants in place. One early case received implant removal and replacement with a smooth textured implant with partial capsulectomy prior to confirmed diagnosis. Three of 18 (16%) who presented with higher stage disease received additional treatment: one received chemotherapy (Brentuximab Vedotin - cyclophosphamide - doxorubicin - prednisone, BV-CHP) followed by RT consolidation, and 2 received RT consolidation only. Patients were followed for a median of 26 months (STDEV 2.22 months) after diagnosis, with clinical exam every 3-6 months (100%), PET/CT in 16/18 (89%), and MR in 4/18 (22%). No patient died of lymphoma progression or recurrence. One patient died from progression of breast cancer. One woman (described above) recurred 2 years after receiving incomplete capsulectomy and smooth surface implant re-placement. She underwent repeat implant removal and bilateral capsulectomy and remains disease free at 6.5 years from the second surgery. Another patient was likely diagnosed at recurrence: she underwent unilateral implant removal and partial unilateral capsulectomy for recurrent delayed seroma (at the time of this implant removal BIA-ALCL could not be confirmed). 1.5 years later she developed a recurrent seroma on the contralateral side where a textured device remained. BIA-ALCL diagnosis was confirmed at this time. Overall survival (Figure 1), was 94% at 2 years and progression-free survival was 89% at 2 years. Conclusions Our data on this cohort of patietns with BIA-ALCL surgically treated and followed at a single institution, confirm the importance of adequate surgery (bilateral implant removal and complete capsulectomy) in patients presenting with seroma-confined disease. This dataset reinforces the high rates of progression free and overall survivalwhen diagnosis is identified and treatment performed in those with limited stage disease. Studies are ongoing to determine the role of somatic mutations like BRCA1-2. Figure: overall and progression-free survival of BIA-ALCL women operated and followed at MSKCC Figure 1 Disclosures Cordeiro: Inamed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acelity: Consultancy; Allergan: Consultancy, Research Funding. Moskowitz:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Miragen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Imbrium Therapeutics, L.P.: Consultancy. Dogan:Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy. Horwitz:Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; ASTEX: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBreast Implant and ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207