MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096938050 · doi:10.32837/chern.v0i2.85

Теоретичні і правові основи національної програми Канади із протидії біологічним загрозам

2020· article· uk· W3096938050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJuris Europensis Scientia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLand Use and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosecurityBiosafetyLegislationLegislatureHarmonizationBusinessPolitical scienceBiotechnologyLawMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines the theoretical and legal foundations of Canada's national program to combat biological threats. Based on the analysis of the legislation of this country, it is stated that the specifics of Canada's national program to combat biological threats is due to a kind of comprehensive approach to addressing this problem, which involves the simultaneous application of biosecurity and biosafety measures. The development of this comprehensive program is considered in four stages. The first stage lasted from 1990 to 1994. Relevant recommendations on biosecurity and biosafety were prepared during it. The second stage (1994-2009) already provided for mandatory compliance with biosecurity and biosafety requirements under the 1994 Regulation on the Regulation of Imports of Human Pathogens and Toxins. The third stage (2009-2013) is characterized by a certain strengthening of control over the NBA in Canada in accordance with the Law on Human Pathogens and Toxins adopted in 2009. A feature of the fourth stage (2013-2015) is the implementation in Canada of the so-called National Program for Harmonization of Standards and Recommendations for Biosecurity and Biosafety in Research with Pathogens in Humans and Terrestrial Animals. It is determined that the control over the observance by the institutions of the fulfillment of the established requirements of biosecurity and biosafety is multilevel, is carried out by a number of subjects: the license holder; designated responsible person for compliance with the requirements of biosafety and biosecurity by the staff of the institution; the relevant commission on biosafety and biosecurity at a specific facility; law enforcement and special services. The comprehensive program is supported by a modern regulatory framework, national standards, and a specialized government agency responsible for administration and enforcement, the Public Health Administration of Canada, which acts as the sole national focal point for biomedical laboratories working with hazardous pathogens for humans. and animals. It is proposed to use this positive experience of Canada in developing a national program of biological safety and biological protection in Ukraine to create a domestic system for combating threats to Ukraine's national security of a biological nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it