MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096938050 · doi:10.32837/chern.v0i2.85

Теоретичні і правові основи національної програми Канади із протидії біологічним загрозам

2020· article· uk· W3096938050 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
М. О. Шилін, М. В. Величко

Bibliographic record

VenueJuris Europensis Scientia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLand Use and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosecurityBiosafetyLegislationLegislatureHarmonizationBusinessPolitical scienceBiotechnologyLawMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines the theoretical and legal foundations of Canada's national program to combat biological threats. Based on the analysis of the legislation of this country, it is stated that the specifics of Canada's national program to combat biological threats is due to a kind of comprehensive approach to addressing this problem, which involves the simultaneous application of biosecurity and biosafety measures. The development of this comprehensive program is considered in four stages. The first stage lasted from 1990 to 1994. Relevant recommendations on biosecurity and biosafety were prepared during it. The second stage (1994-2009) already provided for mandatory compliance with biosecurity and biosafety requirements under the 1994 Regulation on the Regulation of Imports of Human Pathogens and Toxins. The third stage (2009-2013) is characterized by a certain strengthening of control over the NBA in Canada in accordance with the Law on Human Pathogens and Toxins adopted in 2009. A feature of the fourth stage (2013-2015) is the implementation in Canada of the so-called National Program for Harmonization of Standards and Recommendations for Biosecurity and Biosafety in Research with Pathogens in Humans and Terrestrial Animals. It is determined that the control over the observance by the institutions of the fulfillment of the established requirements of biosecurity and biosafety is multilevel, is carried out by a number of subjects: the license holder; designated responsible person for compliance with the requirements of biosafety and biosecurity by the staff of the institution; the relevant commission on biosafety and biosecurity at a specific facility; law enforcement and special services. The comprehensive program is supported by a modern regulatory framework, national standards, and a specialized government agency responsible for administration and enforcement, the Public Health Administration of Canada, which acts as the sole national focal point for biomedical laboratories working with hazardous pathogens for humans. and animals. It is proposed to use this positive experience of Canada in developing a national program of biological safety and biological protection in Ukraine to create a domestic system for combating threats to Ukraine's national security of a biological nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJuris Europensis ScientiaSame topicLand Use and ManagementFrench-language works237,207