The multicollinearity between youth sport environment questionnaire and team assessment diagnostic measurement in sport settings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With interdisciplinary effort, shared mental model from organizational psychology has been introduced in recent years. Even though the concept of shared mental model is established in sport psychology, it still has an operational problem. That is, different researchers have used different measures. The purpose of this research was to examine the multicollinearity between the Team Assessment Diagnostic Measurement (TADM) questionnaire, which measures shared mental model, and the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire (YSEQ), which measures group cohesion. The participants were competitive youth soccer players. TADM and YSEQ were measured at the end of the season. Findings showed that the TADM was highly correlated with task cohesion (r = 0.81) even though VIF did not indicate multicollinearity. Therefore, TADM should be used with caution. Also, based on the definition of the shared mental model, Pathfinder or card sorting is recommended rather than using questionnaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it