O CUIDADO COM A VIDA NUM GRUPO EDUCATIVO DE PESSOAS HIPERTENSAS E DIABÉTICAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to know and discuss the conceptions of hypertensive and diabetic users about the repercussion of the educative group on life care. Method: descriptive study with qualitative approach. The study scenario was in a basic health unit, in the city of Niterói, RJ, in a group of adults and elderly with hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Data collection was performed through semi-structured interviews with 12 users, conducted between December 2018 and February 2019. The analysis technique was thematic content. Results: the sociodemographic profile of the interviewees indicates a predominance of the age group from 60 to 70 years (42%), mostly female (58%), retired (75%) and married (50%).The results were analyzed and organized into the following thematic categories: group as promoter of experiences; group as formulator and maintainer of relations with the health service; group as a self-care promoter. Conclusion: the users' conceptions show that the activity in the health group has a positive impact on the user's well-being, improves socialization, integrates it into the health service, allowing better monitoring of nurses and health professionals. Therefore, it facilitates access to the services provided, as well as stimulating co-responsibility in the context of life care in dealing with chronic diseases. Finally, the group has relevant repercussions on the expansion and emancipation in life care, which is exercised in a dialogic and interactive way in a health education activity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".