Investor Decision in Estimating the Effect of Earning Persistence, Financial Leverage, Foreign Ownership Toward Company Reputation and Company Value
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding company effort on managing corporate reputation and corporate value are challenging tasks among investors. This paper provides an estimated relationship of earning persistence, financial leverage, and foreign ownership on corporate reputation and corporate value on non-financial companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Data are collected from a five-year observation period, ranging 2014 to 2018. A Non probability sampling technique is purposively used to determine the data quality. The collected data are analyzed and processed using SEM method. This study provides a qualitative result showing the relationship among the variables. The financial leverage has no significant effect on company value. In addition, financial leverage also has no significant impact on company reputation compared to foreign ownership toward company reputation. Earning persistence has significantly affected the company value followed by income variability with equal effect toward corporate reputation. Future study can add additional independent variables such as free cash flow and growth opportunities to expand this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it