MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097162507 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-140234

Retro-Prospective Observational Study on the Risk of Progression in Chronic Phase-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients Eligible for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Discontinuation (TFR-PRO)

2020· article· en· W3097162507 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carlo Gambacorti‐Passerini, Alberto Álvarez‐Larrán, Sarit Assouline, Patrizia Pregno, Philipp D. le Coutre, Susanne Saußele, Laura Antolini, Brian Druker

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscontinuationMedicineObservational studyMyeloid leukemiaTyrosine-kinase inhibitorInternal medicineTyrosine kinaseOncologyBosutinibImatinibDasatinibImmunologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background More than 50% of CML patients treated with ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) obtain during treatment a Deep Molecular Response (DMR), defined as the presence of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels lower than 1/10000 (or MR4). Treatment discontinuation (TD) in CP-CML patients with stable DMR has proven successful in approximately half of cases, with relapse free survival (RFS) of 48-61% at 3 years. TD proved a safe option, since virtually all patients leukemia regains optimal control with TKI rechallenge, and treatment-free remission (TFR) is usually attempted outside clinical trials. The occurrence of tumor progression, i.e. the progression to Accelerated Phase/Blast Crisis (AP/BC) has been considered a rare event. However, reports document at least six cases of disease progression after TD, some of which were fatal. These observations raise concerns about the safety of TKI discontinuation, since now we can no longer consider this practice as completely immune from the risk of disease progression, a condition which dramatically changes the patient situation and perspective. Nevertheless, a precise quantification of the risk of progression in this setting has not been determined. Study Design and Methods The TFR-PRO project will monitor approximately 3000 CML patients in long term treatment and with stable and minimal residual disease (MR4 or better) followed at 28 centers in 5 different countries (US, Canada, Italy, Germany, Spain). Each center is expected to enroll approximately 100 patients. A total of 30000 person years will be collected. The following variables will be measured: time adjusted rates (TAR) of molecular relapse and of progression to AP/BC; progression free and overall survival; incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and evaluation of Quality of Life indicators. Primary Objective To quantify the risk of progression to AP/BP, expressed as TAR, after TKI discontinuation in CML patients who undergo a first or subsequent TKI discontinuation attempt. This value will be compared to that obtained in a similar population of patients with the same characteristics who do not discontinue TKI treatment. Patients eligibility includes a history of at least 4 years of TKI treatment and at least 18 months of DMR. Events developing in patients after the end of discontinuation and TKI resumption will be considered linked to the discontinuation if they will develop within 36 months from the end of discontinuation. This rule will apply also to subsequent TD attempts. In case of a second or subsequent discontinuation attempt after the failure of a previous one (for molecular relapse), patients must have re-achieved a DMR with TKI therapy resumption and must keep DMR for at least 18 months before another TD. Collection of data will be retrospective and prospective, as each center will collect the data for 24 months. Patients who become eligible before the opening of this study will contribute to the retrospective cohort, while those who will enter after it will contribute to the prospective cohort. Patients who will become eligible before the opening of this study but will continue after it, will contribute to both cohorts. Sample size calculations were obtained assuming a contrast between risks of progression to AP or BP of 0.001% under treatment versus 0.1% under discontinuation (Figure 1). Study group classification will be defined as a binary non reversible time-varying factor where eligible patients are divided into two groups at the beginning of the follow-up depending on the presence or absence of discontinuation, and in the latter case may start discontinuation during the follow-up and thus change dynamically the study group classification. Descriptive statistics on the main end-point will be obtained by the "Simon-Makuch" version of the Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Exponential model will be used for the calculation of confidence intervals on rates. Flexible Poisson model and Cox model will be used for data analysis adjusting for potential prognostics factors. The dynamic nature of the study group classification will be handled by left truncation. The study was opened on July 24th. Eligible patients belonging to the prospective cohort will be entered in TFR-PRO between August 1st, 2020 and August 1st, 2021 while those in the retrospective cohort will be entered by November 1, 2020. Total duration of the study will be of 24 months. Disclosures Gambacorti-Passerini: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Assouline:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pregno:Incyte-Italy,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference reports; Novartis-Italy: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference reports; Pfizer-Italy: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference reports. le Coutre:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Saussele:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Druker:EnLiven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GRAIL: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Henry Stewart Talks: Patents & Royalties; Iterion Therapeutics (formerly Beta Cat Pharmaceuticals): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; McGraw Hill: Patents & Royalties; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties; Millipore (formerly Upstate Biotechnology): Patents & Royalties; MolecularMD (acquired by ICON): Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Oregon Health & Science University: Patents & Royalties; Patient True Talks: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Third Coast Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VB Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Research Funding; Aptose Therapeutics Inc. (formerly Lorus): Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ALLCRON: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aileron Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Cepheid: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Patents & Royalties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207