MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3097170862 · doi:10.24908/jcri.v7i2.14263

BOOK REVIEW: Dying of Whiteness: How the Politics of Racial Resentment is Killing America’s Heartland by Metzl, J. M. (2019).

2020· article· en· W3097170862 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sarah Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Critical Race Inquiry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResentmentPoliticsPolitical scienceSociologyGender studiesCriminologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Dying of Whiteness, psychiatrist Jonathan M. Metzl explores the impact of conservative policies on the health and perspectives of white Americans.Travelling through Missouri, Tennessee, and Kansas, Metzl discovered that negative attitudes toward gun control, social services, and government spending arise from a deeply embedded politics of "racial resentment" and that more white Americans are willing to vote against their own interests in order to protect what they consider to be their fundamental freedoms, such as the right to bear arms.Using a combination of field research and public health data, Metzl successfully argues that the resulting policy decisions, supported by many white Americans, are rooted in white supremacy and the history of racism in the United States.The book is organized into three main parts, each focusing on a single state and policy issue.The first part of the book explores pro-gun laws in Missouri and increasing rates of accidental injury and/or death by suicide involving firearms among the white population in the state.Working with a suicide loss survivor group, Metzl found that even though many of the group members lost loved ones to firearm related suicide, the majority were willing to defend their freedom to own a gun.Most survivors in the group believed that their loved ones died because they failed to see the warning signs associated with depression and suicidality.When asked if they thought that guns made it easier to commit suicide, the majority upheld the belief that suicide prevention rests on recognizing symptoms and warning signs and do not believe that access to a firearm is a danger.Metzl connects these assertions to a broader politics of "racial resentment" and the history of racism and gun laws in the United States.He traces these ideas back to early colonial America, during which time firearms were "armaments of white upper-class power"

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Critical Race Inquiry→Same topicRace, History, and American Society→French-language works237,207→