Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jitta occupait un espace intellectuel particulier, entre universalisme et nationalisme et entre perspectives théoriques centrées sur l’État et celles qui prenaient pour point de mire l’individu. Sa pensée formait une alternative différente, assez radicale, à la théorie et à la méthodologie dominantes du droit international privé de son temps. Il rejetait la compréhension traditionnelle de la méthode de Savigny destinée à localiser les questions juridiques transnationales, contestait fondamentalement la prémisse selon laquelle on pouvait choisir un droit au mépris de son contenu, refusait de centrer sa perspective sur le concept de souveraineté des États. Pourtant, ses projets initiaux de réforme radicale ont évolué dans un sens plus pragmatique au contact des importantes transformations socio-politiques survenues après la Première Guerre mondiale. Cette progression offre beaucoup à apprendre tout en appelant à une réflexion critique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".