MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097204029 · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/abc59e

Structure, reactions, and electronic spectra of the rare gas cyanohydrides and isocyanohydrides, HRgCN and HRgNC (Rg <b>=</b> Xe or Rn)

2020· article· en· W3097204029 on OpenAlexafffund
Miriam D van Hoeve, Mariusz Kłobukowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHOMO/LUMOPhysicsAtomic physicsBathochromic shiftSpectral lineXenonPseudopotentialBasis setBond-dissociation energyTime-dependent density functional theoryMolecular orbitalMolecular physicsDensity functional theoryMoleculeExcited state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The low-energy electronic excitations of HRgCN and HRgNC (Rg = Xe, Rn) were computed at the TDDFT level of theory, both in the gas phase and in xenon cluster. It was found that the most prominent peak in the spectra was due to the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) transition (∼6 eV for HRgCN and ∼4.5 eV for HRgNC). Cluster confinement brought about bathochromic shifts in the spectra and better agreement with experiment for HXeCN. The effects of spin–orbit coupling (SOC) in the heavier Rn systems were investigated: for HRnCN, SOC red-shifted the HOMO–LUMO peak, while it blue-shifted the HOMO–LUMO peak for HRnNC. Geometry optimizations were carried out for the HRgCN and HRgNC systems to locate minima and transition states for dissociation and isomerization. Effects of isotopic substitution on reaction rates were predicted. A new model core potentials basis set was introduced and effectiveness of several pseudopotential basis sets was studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsSame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207