A Deep Learning Approach for Multi-Depth Soil Water Content Prediction in Summer Maize Growth Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advance knowledge of soil water content (SWC) in the soil wetting layer of crop irrigation can help develop more reasonable irrigation plans and improve the efficiency of agricultural irrigation water use. To improve the accuracy of predicting SWC at multiple depths, the ResBiLSTM model was proposed, in which continuous meteorological and SWC data were gridded and transformed as model inputs, and then high-dimensional spatial and time series features were extracted by ResNet and BiLSTM, respectively, and integrated by a meta-learner. Meteorological, SWC and growth stage records data from seven typical maize monitoring stations in Hebei Province, China, during the 2016-2018 summer maize planting process were utilized for the training, evaluation and testing of the ResBiLSTM model, with model prediction targets set at 20cm, 30cm, 40cm and 50cm depths. Experimental results showed that: 1) ResBiLSTM model could achieve better model fit and prediction of meteorological and SWC data at all growth stages, with R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> within [0.818, 0.991], average MAE within [0.79%, 2.00%], and the overall prediction accuracy ranked as follows: anthesis maturity stage > seedling stage > tassel stage; 2) The average MSE of the ResBiLSTM model for the prediction of SWC in the next 1-6 days was within [3.91%, 15.82%], and the prediction accuracy decreased with the extension of the prediction time; 3) Compared with the classical machine learning model and related deep learning models, the ResBiLSTM model was able to obtain better prediction accuracy performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".