MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097262382 · doi:10.22215/etd/2013-10023

Numerical Study of Aeroelastic Behaviour of a Troposkien Shape Vertical Axis Wind Turbine

2013· dissertation· en· W3097262382 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Fereidooni

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeroelasticityWakeAerodynamicsVertical axis wind turbineStall (fluid mechanics)Structural engineeringTurbineAerodynamic forceFinite element methodEngineeringVortexWind tunnelDisplacement (psychology)MechanicsAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A methodology for aeroelastic analysis of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines (VAWTs) with troposkien geometry is developed.The structural dynamic equations used in this analysis represent the behaviour of a three dimensionally curved beam in terms of generalized force and generalized displacement vectors.This linear formulation takes into account the effect of the Coriolis forces and centrifugal stiffening.It is demonstrated that the mixed form of I would like to extend my gratitude to my supervisors Professor Fred Nitzsche and Professor Edgar Matida for providing an open, friendly and collaborative research environment.I would like to thank Professor Nitzsche for teaching me how to think as an independent researcher.I appreciate Professor Matida for his help any time I had to deal with a challenging situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207