MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097281721 · doi:10.1075/bpa.10.09li

Speech perception in French immersion students in Western Canada

2020· book-chapter· en· W3097281721 on OpenAlex
Fangfang Li, Nicole Netelenbos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBilingual processing and acquisition · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrench immersionActive listeningPerceptionVoice-onset timePsychologyAP French LanguageLinguisticsContext (archaeology)Speech perceptionHistoryCommunicationPedagogyLanguage assessment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present study reports on stop consonant perception of voice onset time (VOT) in Anglophone children enrolled in a French immersion (FI) elementary school in Western Canada. Fifty-seven children in grades 1, 3, and 5 were tested in both English and French for the three pairs of stops (/p/-/b/, /t/-/d/, and /k/-/g/). They were asked to identify words that begin with these stop consonants when listening to the audio prompts. We found that FI students’ French perception exhibits language-appropriate VOT boundaries for all three pairs but they have difficulty with identifying French voiced stops. Children’s French perception remains constant across grades. Our findings highlight the role played by educational context and the social status of L2 in second language learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it