MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097324874 · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2015.7356046

Application of ion implanted emitter in PERC solar cells

2015· article· en· W3097324874 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jian Wu, Yunyu Liu, Xusheng Wang, Guoqiang Xing

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivationMaterials scienceSolar cellCommon emitterOptoelectronicsAnnealing (glass)DopantIon implantationDielectricCrystalline siliconSilicon nitrideSiliconLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyDopingMetallurgyIonChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ion-implantation offers numerous advantages (i.e. single side precise control and reproducibility of the dopant, simultaneous SiO2 passivation during annealing, no phosphosilicate glass formation) for solar cell manufacturing. Canadian Solar Inc. (CSI) has developed an average efficiency 19.23% blank emitter solar cell (156mm Cz) process. In order to improve the solar cell efficiency, focus is placed on the well known advanced PERC solar cell architecture with optimized back side passivation. The approach is to combine the surface passivation provided by a thin ALD aluminum oxide layer grown after the post implantation annealing (PIA) process with a deposited capping silicon nitride layer. Laser ablation and proper aluminum paste is also used to locally remove the dielectric layers and to form local contact. Based on this development, implanted emitter and local Al-BSF with Al2O3/SiNx back passivation are integrated in solar cells reaching an average efficiency 19.96%, and champion 20.12%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207