MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097339993 · doi:10.1101/2020.08.25.20154252

SARS-CoV-2 RNA viremia is associated with a sepsis-like host response and critical illness in COVID-19

2020· preprint· en· W3097339993 on OpenAlexafffund
Jesús F. Bermejo-Martín, Milagros González‐Rivera, Raquel Almansa, Dariela Micheloud, Marta Domínguez‐Gil, Salvador Resino, Marta Martín-Fernández, Pablo Ryan, Felipe Pérez‐García, Luís Tamayo, Raúl López‐Izquierdo, Elena Bustamante, César Aldecoa, Jesús Rico-Feijoó, Antonio Orduña, Raúl Méndez, Isabel Fernández Natal, Gregoria Megías, Montserrat González-Estecha, Demetrio Carriedo, Cristina Doncel, Noelia Jorge, José Antonio Fernández-Ratero, Wysali Trapiello, Paula González‐Jiménez, Guadalupe Ruíz, Alyson A. Kelvin, Ali Toloue Ostadgavahi, Ruth Oneizat, Luz María Ruiz, Iría Miguens, Esther Gargallo, Ioana Muñoz, Sara Pelegrin, Silvia Martín, Pablo García Olivares, Jamil Cedeño, Tomás Ruíz Albi, Carolina Puertas, José Ángel Berezo, Gloria Renedo, Rubén Herrán, Juan Bustamante‐Munguira, Pedro Enríquez, Ramón Cicuéndez, Jesús Blanco, Jésica Abadía, Julia Gómez Barquero, Nuria Mamolar, Natalia Blanca‐López, Luis Jorge Valdivia, Belén Fernández Caso, María Ángeles Mantecón, Ana Motos, Laia Fernández‐Barat, Ricard Ferrer, Ferrán Barbé, Antoni Torres, Rosario Menéndez, José María Eirós Bouza, David J. Kelvin

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsViremiaImmunologyMedicineViral loadSepsisPneumoniaPathogenesisSeverity of illnessInternal medicineVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Severe COVID-19 is characterized by clinical and biological manifestations typically observed in sepsis. SARS-CoV-2 RNA is commonly detected in nasopharyngeal swabs, however viral RNA can be found also in peripheral blood and other tissues. Whether systemic spreading of the virus or viral components plays a role in the pathogenesis of the sepsis-like disease observed in severe COVID-19 is currently unknown. Methods We determined the association of plasma SARS-CoV-2 RNA with the biological responses and the clinical severity of patients with COVID-19. 250 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection were recruited (50 outpatients, 100 hospitalised ward patients, and 100 critically ill). The association between plasma SARS-CoV-2 RNA and laboratory parameters was evaluated using multivariate GLM with a gamma distribution. The association between plasma SARS-CoV-2 RNA and severity was evaluated using multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis and Generalized Linear Model (GLM) analysis with a binomial distribution. Results The presence of SARS-CoV-2-RNA viremia was independently associated with a number of features consistently identified in sepsis: 1) high levels of cytokines (including CXCL10, CCL-2, IL-10, IL-1ra, IL-15, and G-CSF); 2) higher levels of ferritin and LDH; 3) low lymphocyte and monocyte counts 4) and low platelet counts. In hospitalised patients, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-RNA viremia was independently associated with critical illness: (adjusted OR= 8.30 [CI95%=4.21 - 16.34], p < 0.001). CXCL10 was the most accurate identifier of SARS-CoV-2-RNA viremia in plasma (area under the curve (AUC), [CI95%], p) = 0.85 [0.80 - 0.89), <0.001]), suggesting its potential role as a surrogate biomarker of viremia. The cytokine IL-15 most accurately differentiated clinical ward patients from ICU patients (AUC: 0.82 [0.76 - 0.88], <0.001). Conclusions systemic dissemination of genomic material of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a sepsis-like biological response and critical illness in patients with COVID-19. RNA viremia could represent an important link between SARS-CoV-2 infection, host response dysfunction and the transition from moderate illness to severe, sepsis-like COVID-19 disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207