MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097350163 · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2021)140

Higher rank FZZ-dualities

2021· article· en· W3097350163 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCosetConformal field theoryDuality (order theory)Conformal mapField (mathematics)Equivalence (formal languages)Liouville field theoryVertex (graph theory)Minimal models

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract We examine strong/weak dualities in two dimensional conformal field theories by generalizing the Fateev-Zamolodchikov-Zamolodchikov (FZZ-)duality between Witten’s cigar model described by the $$ \mathfrak{sl}(2)/\mathfrak{u}(1) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>sl</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> coset and sine-Liouville theory. In a previous work, a proof of the FZZ-duality was provided by applying the reduction method from $$ \mathfrak{sl}(2) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>sl</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten model to Liouville field theory and the self-duality of Liouville field theory. In this paper, we work with the coset model of the type $$ \mathfrak{sl}\left(N+1\right)/\left(\mathfrak{sl}(N)\times \mathfrak{u}(1)\right) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>sl</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>sl</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> and investigate the equivalence to a theory with an $$ \mathfrak{sl}\left(N+\left.1\right|N\right) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>sl</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> structure. We derive the duality explicitly for N = 2 , 3 by applying recent works on the reduction method extended for $$ \mathfrak{sl}(N) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>sl</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> and the self-duality of Toda field theory. Our results can be regarded as a conformal field theoretic derivation of the duality of the Gaiotto-Rapčák corner vertex operator algebras Y 0 ,N,N +1 [ ψ ] and Y N, 0 ,N +1 [ ψ − 1 ].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it