MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097373090 · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8111703

Arabinogalactan Utilization by Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum NCC 2705 and Bacteroides caccae ATCC 43185 in Monoculture and Coculture

2020· article· en· W3097373090 on OpenAlex
Yan Wang, Gisèle LaPointe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroorganisms · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBifidobacterium longumBacteroidesBiologyMicrobiologyActinomycetaceaeBifidobacteriumBacteriaGeneticsLactobacillus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arabinogalactan (AG) has been studied as a potential prebiotic in view of stimulating bifidobacteria presence in the gut microbiota. However, bifidobacteria prefer fermentation of oligosaccharides to that of polysaccharides. The contribution of other gut bacteria may allow better growth of bifidobacteria on AG. β-galactanases and β-galactosidases are the main enzymes for the degradation of AG. Additional enzymes such as α-L-arabinofuranosidase and β-L-arabinopyranosidase are required to remove the arabinose side chains. All of these predicted functions are encoded by the genomes of both Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum NCC 2705 and Bacteroides caccae ATCC 43185. However, neither strain was able to grow significantly on AG, with 25% (B. longum subsp. longum NCC 2705) and 39% (Bac. caccae ATCC 43185) of AG degraded after 48-h fermentation, respectively. In this study, the β-galactanase, β-galactosidase, α-L-arabinofuranosidase, and β-L-arabinopyranosidase from both strains were investigated. The extracellular β-galactosidases of both B. longum subsp. longum NCC 2705 and Bac. caccae ATCC 43185 were able to cleave the β-1,3; 1,4 and 1,6 linkages. However, the β-galactosidase activity of B. longum subsp. longum NCC 2705 was weaker for the β-1,4 linkage, compared with the β-1,3 and 1,6 linkages. The arabinose side chains of AG inhibited the cleavage of β-1,3 and 1,6 linkages by the endo-β-galactanase from both strains, and partially inhibited the cleavage of β-1,4 linkages by the endo-β-1,4 galactanase from Bac. caccae ATCC 43185. The α-L-arabinofuranosidase and β-L-arabinopyranosidase from both strains were unable to cleave arabinose from AG under the conditions used. These results show limited breakdown of AG by these two strains in monoculture. When cocultured with Bac. caccae ATCC 43185, B. longum subsp. longum NCC 2705 grew significantly better than in monoculture on AG after 6 h of fermentation (p < 0.05). The coculture showed 48% AG degradation after 48 h of fermentation, along with reduced pH. Furthermore, compared to monoculture of Bac. caccae ATCC 43185, the concentration of succinate significantly increased from 0.01 ± 0.01 to 4.41 ± 0.61 mM, whereas propionate significantly decreased from 13.07 ± 0.37 to 9.75 ± 2.01 mM in the coculture (p < 0.05). These results suggest that the growth and metabolic activities of Bac. caccae ATCC 43185 were restrained in the coculture, as the pH decreased due to the metabolism of B. longum subsp. longum NCC 2705.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it