MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maculopapular Rash Related to Atomoxetine: Case Report

2020· article· en· W3097425830 on OpenAlexaff
Nurdan Kasar, Çiğdem Yektaş, Ali Evren Tufan

Bibliographic record

VenueÇocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi / Turkish Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomoxetineMaculopapular rashRashPsychologyDermatologyMedicinePsychiatryAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exanthematous drug eruptions, also known as maculopapular drug eruptions, are the most common drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Pruritus, urticaria, exanthematous rash, fixed drug eruption, photosensitivity, pigmentation and alopecia are common skin reactions to psychotropic medications. Atomoxetine (ATX), a selective inhibitor of presynaptic norepinephrine transporters (SNRI), is classified as a non-stimulant and is commonly used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It also binds to dopamine and serotonin transporters with a low affinity. Abdominal pain, loss of appetite, somnolence, irritability, fatigue, dizziness and dyspepsia are the most common side effects of ATX. Major cutaneous drug reactions with SNRIs are rarely reported in the literature. Here we present an eight-year-old girl diagnosed with ADHD who had a drug-induced skin reaction after an increase in the dosage of ATX treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÇocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi / Turkish Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental HealthSame topicDrug-Induced Ocular ToxicityFrench-language works237,207