MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097439600 · doi:10.4324/9781315103754-11

Missed opportunity

2019· book-chapter· en· W3097439600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Webster

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScience, Research, and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reshuffle provided the opportunity for the removal of the marginalised Aristide Briand, with Pierre Laval taking the foreign ministry himself and Tardieu replacing Maginot at the war ministry. Laval took the opportunity to try to widen his coalition by offering a number of cabinet posts to the Radicals, including that of foreign minister to Edouard Herriot; the offer was refused, though Herriot did announce that he would support Laval on important questions of foreign policy. The French in particular were unhappy with what seemed to them both to be a salvo in the naval disarmament talks and a threat to their spending on frontier fortifications. The General Convention was signed by twenty-two states by the time the World Disarmament Conference opened in February 1932, including Germany and France, though only minor states ever actually ratified it. Amidst the building crescendo of public demands for disarmament, the looming deadline of 2 February 1932 was viewed in many cabinet rooms with trepidation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScience, Research, and MedicineFrench-language works237,207