Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artikel ini bermaksud untuk menggambarkan dan menjelaskan Totem sebagai dasar agama lokal di Biak yang dapat membentuk jejaring sosio religius kultural masyarakat Biak. Metode etnografi dan teknik fenomenologi digunakan, serta untuk mendapatkan data, diperoleh dari observasi partisipan, wawancara dan studi pustaka. Setiap manusia yang memiliki potensi adalah manusia adat dan tradisi. Ia terbina, teresapi dan terlibat dengan seluruh cara, aturan, hukum, ajaran adat dan tradisi tersebut. Adat dan tradisi adalah suatu warisan rohani masyarakat yang diritualisasikan berulang-ulang kali sehingga maknanya dimengerti dan diresapi. Adat dan tradisi itu tidak hanya diceritakan, tetapi juga disimbolkan ke dalam nama-nama tertentu, tempat atau benda. Artikel ini menyingkapkan bahwa jejaring sosio religius kultural orang Biak, bukan hanya terbentuk karena proses perjumpaan di masa lalu, tetapi sebaliknya ikatan sosio religius kultural orang Biak hidup melalui totem yang merupakan implementasi dari penghormatan kepada Tuhan. Demikian artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa totem sebagai dasar agama lokal di Biak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.087 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".