MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3097468068

Epigenetic contributions to early life history variation in Chinook salmon

2020· article· en· W3097468068 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Clare J. Venney

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsChinook windVariation (astronomy)BiologyLife historyFisheryEvolutionary biologyOncorhynchusFish <Actinopterygii>Ecology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA methylation has been proposed as an epigenetic, evolutionary mechanism for acclimation, transgenerational plasticity, and local adaptation without changes in DNA sequence. In this thesis, I assess the highly targeted evolutionary nature of DNA methylation in Chinook salmon from the tissue to the population level, with important implications for organism survival and evolution. First, I developed a PCR-based bisulfite assay for Next-Generation sequencing for genes involved in growth, development, immune function, stress response, and metabolism (Chapter 2). Locus- and tissue-specific methylation was assessed in inbred and outbred Chinook salmon at two developmental stages (fry and yearling). This chapter established DNA methylation as a mechanism targeted to specific loci, tissues, levels of inbreeding, and developmental stages/environmental contexts. I assessed the role of DNA methylation in the propagation of maternal effects at three early developmental stages (egg, alevin, and fry; Chapter 3). Two 6x6 fully factorial Chinook salmon breeding crosses were used to estimate maternal effects. DNA methylation was assessed using bisulfite sequencing and both locus-specific and CpG-specific maternal effects were identified. This chapter established DNA methylation as a potential mechanism for the transmission of maternal effects, which can have important influences on offspring development and fitness. I quantified the effects of early environment on the genetic architecture of DNA methylation using 6x6 factorial crosses reared in two environments: a hatchery and a semi-natural channel (Chapter 4). Additive, non-additive, and maternal variance components, combined with environmental and GxE effects for DNA methylation were calculated. Rearing environment caused gene-specific plasticity in methylation, as well as differences in the genetic architecture of methylation. This chapter identified the importance of both genetic and environmental variation in controlling methylation, with important implications for methylation as an acclimation or adaptive mechanism. Finally, I characterized differences in locus-specific methylation among eight populations of Chinook salmon (Chapter 5). The significant population differences in locus-specific methylation were tested for correlation with environmental variables from natal streams, and pairwise FST estimates (microsatellite and SNP data). I identified no effects of rearing environment, but a weak among-population correlation between methylation and microsatellite FST indicating that genetic drift is influencing methylation. Population-level differences in DNA methylation suggest methylation may contribute to local adaptation and is certainly an important additional source of phenotypic variation. In conclusion, my doctoral research evaluated the role of DNA methylation from the tissue to the population level. My results support DNA methylation as a novel, potentially adaptive mechanism, contributing to normal organism function, transgenerational plasticity through maternal effects, plasticity, and population-level acclimation or adaptation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→