Interpretation of network-based integration from multi-omics longitudinal data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cost reduction of high-throughput technologies has enabled the monitoring of the same biological sample across multiple omics studies and multiple timepoints. The goal is to combine longitudinal multi-omics data to detect temporal relationships between molecules and interactions between omics layers. This can finally lead to uncover new regulation mechanisms and interactions that could be responsible for causing complex phenotype or disease. However multi-omics integration of diverse omics data is still challenging due to heterogeneous data and designs. Moreover, interpretation of multi-omics models is the key to understand biological systems. We propose a generic analytic and integration framework for multi-omics longitudinal datasets that consists of multi-omics kinetic clustering and multi-layer network-based analysis. This frame-work was successfully applied to two case studies with different experimental designs and omics data collected. The first case studied transcriptomic and proteomic changes during cell cycle in human HeLa cells, while the second focused on maize transcriptomic and metabolomic response to aphid feeding. Propagation analysis on multi-layer networks identifies regulatory mechanisms and function prediction for both case studies. Our framework has led to the identification of new multi-layer interactions involved in key biological functions that cannot be revealed with single omics analysis and interplay in the kinetics that could help identify novel biological mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".