Transitions towards energy-efficient appliances in urban households of Gujarat state, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Residential sector accounted for 24% of the total electricity consumption in India during 2009–10 and has almost remained around one-quarter over the last decade. A total of 163 same urban households were surveyed in 2018 to ascertain the change in penetration and use of energy-efficient (EE) appliances therein over 2010–18. There was a significant increase in their penetration across each enduse category with main changes being in air conditioners (ACs) (47%) and LED lights (over 38 times) over 2010–18. The weighted average relative electricity consumption decreased from 0.89 to 0.44 for ACs (1.5TR), 0.42 to 0.23 for lighting lamps, 0.95 to 0.54 for tubelights, 0.98 to 0.68 for refrigerators, and 0.94 to 0.69 for TVs, indicating the lowering of average energy consumption due to EE appliances. The annual electricity savings at household level were found statistically significant for transitions to EE ACs and ceiling fans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".