MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097617569 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2020.41019

Mechanical Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Practice and Innovation Effectiveness Analysis

2020· article· en· W3097617569 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xinhua Wang, Tianjian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipProcess (computing)FeelingInnovation managementLivelihoodEngineering educationProduct (mathematics)Product innovationEngineeringField (mathematics)Knowledge managementBusinessMarketingEngineering managementComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Innovation and entrepreneurship education is a hot spot in my country's higher education field in recent years. Based on the characteristic practical experience and typical cases of the 5-year professional innovation and entrepreneurship education in mechanical engineering at the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology from 2015 to 2019, this article clarifies the specific implementation procedures of innovation and entrepreneurship practices based on professional knowledge in mechanical engineering and analyzes the implementation effects. In practice, each mechanical engineering innovation team can independently complete the innovative product design and communicate with the manufacturer during the entire manufacturing process to complete the process design, patent application protection for the results, and obtain the core required for innovation and entrepreneurship Ability to achieve the goal of the school’s innovation ability training. At the same time, innovation starts from meeting the most basic school and family needs, and gradually shifts to meeting social needs and paying attention to people's livelihood. Students' vision, awareness of innovation, innovation ability, innovative feelings and family spirit are also improving year by year. The innovative and entrepreneurial education practice with the characteristics of mechanical engineering has achieved good results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207