Potential of Indigenous Vegetable-Fortified Food Products for Improved Human Nutrition and Health in West Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study developed and tested the acceptability of key innovative value-added products, including vegetable-fortified bread and pastry products (cookies and chinchin), using each of these three indigenous vegetables, namely Telfairia occidentalis Hook. F. (fluted pumpkin), Amaranthus virdis L. (local amaranth), and Solanum macrocarpon L. (eggplant). The bread was fortified with each of the individual dried leafy vegetables at levels of 1%, 3%, and 5%. Ogi was also fortified with the equivalent of the dried Telfaria occidentalis in the wet form at 1%, 3%, and 5%, while pastry was fortified with the only extract obtained from amaranth leafy vegetable at 1%, 3%, and 5%. Results from the MicroVeg project showed that bread fortified with 3% (w/w) dried vegetable leaf powders had higher nutritional properties. Pastry formulations that included 3% dried vegetable leaf powders had slightly lower consumer acceptability in terms of taste and color; however, due to the associated potential health benefits, consumers were willing to buy the vegetable-fortified products as replacements for the regular products. This chapter discusses the full details of the nutrition and value addition aspects of MicroVeg with empirical examples of the interventions and the potential contributions to dietary diversity and enhanced family nutrition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".